Psychology 121, Lecture 3

by Hal S. Kopeikin, Ph.D. © 2000


 Overview

Most psychological test scores are relative, with their meaning dependent on comparison to the scores of others. This lecture examines the kinds of statistics used to summarize a population of scores, and to compare a given score to that population. The final section on correlation and regression summarize a few other statistics that are very useful in describing the covariation between scores, i.e. how much they vary together.

Describing a group of scores

1. Measure of central tendency

In a perfect bell curve population, the mean, median, and mode are all the same number but this is not always the case. For instance in a bimodal population there might be two modes. This might be the result of two distinct sub-groups within the population. 2. Variability: How great are the differences between scores. This is measured by variance and standard deviation. Standard deviation squared = variance.

Computation of the variance

    1. (Observed score - mean) = deviation score
    2. square each deviation score (to render all deviations positive)
    3. sum together all deviations scores, then divide by the number of scores

3. Skew

Some distributions are skewed in the positive or negative direction relative to a perfect bell curve.

Common Comparisons between a Score and Norms

= (raw score - mean)/SD

= number of standard deviations from mean

= 50 + 10Z

Advantages & disadvantages of comparison methods

Percentile and percentile rank

The strength is that they are very intuitive.

The biggest problem is that they tell you had you did relative to other people rather than telling you how much you know (if knowledge is the thing being tested). They tend to overemphasize the importance of differences around the mean and underestimate the importance of differences at the extreme. Many people are concentrated around the mean so doing just a little bit better on a test will raise your percentile rank significantly.

Z and T scores

The strength is that they are very precise and you can go from a Z score to a percentile. Importantly, they can be used for comparisons between different tests even if the original tests were on different scales. They are also easy to calculate.

(You should know score distributions in a standard distribution in terms of Z scores: 34% between 0 and 1 in the Z score, 14% between 1 and 2 in the z score, and 2% between 2 and 3 in the z scores. The percentages are the same in the negatives.) The biggest problem is that nobody but statisticians usually understand them.

Age, grade-equivalent, and developmental scales

The biggest strength is that they are intuitively clear.

The drawbacks are (a) There is no idea of the variability of the scores, only what the average is; (b) There is no breakdown of the information known. For instance, you might be doing arithmetic at a grade level two beyond your own but you might only know some of the skills very well and others not at all. It would be unwise to skip the grades as might be suggested by the grad-equivalency scores; (c) The scores are only appropriate where there is a relatively linear relationship between the age (or grade or development) and the performance. If performance tends to come at uneven rates, you won't know how much better or worse you are doing by you age or grade or developmental scores.


Correlation and Regression

Scatterplots= Scattergrams= Scatter Diagrams. The terms are interchangeable. Scatterplots allow you to see the relationship between two variables. They consist of an axis for each of the variables with points marking the results of different individuals in the two variables. See pg. 66 or the blackboard for an example.

Regression Line = The best-fitting straight line summarizing a scatterplot

predicted Y = intercept + (slope* X)

Correlation and Regression